Not the End
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

Mere Christianity, Day 6: The Invasion

1/6/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
So, picking up where chapter one leaves off, Lewis begins chapter two saying that, yes, Atheism is too simple, but so is what he calls Christianity-and-water: the view that says "there is a good God in Heaven and everything is all right - leaving out all the difficult and terrible doctrines about sin and hell and the devil, and the redemption." According to him, these are both children's philosophies. And yet, this childish version of Christianity is not only what many people hold but also what many of the opponents attack. When you try to explain the real doctrines of Christianity to these individuals, they "complain that you are making their heads turn round and that it is all too complicated and that if there really were a God they are sure He would have made 'religion' simple, because simplicity is so beautiful, etc."

But Reality is not simple. It is not neat, not obvious, and not what you expect. Reality is complicated and odd and surprising. In fact, this is one of the reasons Lewis says he believes Christianity because it actually is not neat and simple and not what you would expect or what anyone would have made up. When you really look at it and really examine what Christianity says about the world, about humanity, about the God over it all, "it has just that queer twist about it that real things have." 

So he says to put away these children's philosophies and over-simplified answers to the questions we are asking. Neither the problem nor the answer are simple.

The Problem: We have a universe that "contains much that is obviously bad and apparently meaningless" but which also contains "creatures like ourselves who know that it is bad and meaningless."
Lewis says that there are only two possible views that face all the facts of the Problem and provide a consistent and rational answer:
Picture
Picture
Lewis says the Dualism view cannot actually be the answer to the problem because Good and Evil cannot be on equal footing. It cannot merely be a preference of one over the other because then we ought to "give up talking about good and evil at all. For good means what you ought to prefer quite regardless of what you happen to like at any given moment." If it is not simply a matter of preference or choosing which side you like at a particular moment, then it must mean that one of the powers is Right and the other is Wrong, which takes us back to the Moral Law, the standard by which the two powers are judged, and means that whoever created the Moral Law would actually be the ultimate authority over Good and Evil.

"The same point can be made in a different way. If Dualism is true, then the bad Power must be a being who likes badness for its own sake. But in reality we have no experience of anyone liking badness just because it is bad. The nearest we can get to it is in cruelty. But in real life people are cruel for one of two reasons- either because they are sadists, that is, because they have a sexual perversion which makes cruelty a cause of sensual pleasure to them, or else for the sake of something they are going to get out of it - money, or power, or safety. But pleasure, money, power, and safety are all, as far as they go, good things. The badness consists in pursuing them by the wrong method, or in the wrong way, or too much. I do not mean, of course, that the people who do this are not desperately wicked. I do mean that wickedness, when you examine it, turns out to be the pursuit of some good in the wrong way. You can be good for the mere sake of goodness: you cannot be bad for the mere sake of badness. You can do a kind action when you are not feeling kind and when it gives you no pleasure, simply because kindness is right; but no one ever did a cruel action simply because cruelty is wrong - only because cruelty was pleasant or useful to him. In other words badness cannot succeed even in being bad in the same way in which goodness is good. Goodness is, so to speak, itself: badness is only spoiled goodness. And there must be something good first before it can be spoiled."
These are the reasons Dualism cannot provide the answer. Which leaves us with Christianity. And Lewis admits that Christianity comes very close to Dualism in that there is a battle between Good and Evil. It is just that Christianity is not a war between two independent powers, but rather a civil war, where Evil has rebelled against the Good and now occupies the territory that is the world we live in. Christianity is the story of how the Rightful King entered that Enemy-occupied territory and is calling us all to take part in the battle to restore the Good. 
Why is Christianity-and-water such an appealing view?
How has that view helped the cause of Atheism and damaged the reputation of Christianity?

*This post is part of a 31 day series on C.S. Lewis' book Mere Christianity. If this is your first stop along the way, I am so glad you’re here! I would love to interact with you in the comments, or you can email me by clicking on the "Contact Me" tab at the top right of the page. All of the blog posts in this series will be linked together on the intro page if you are interested in reading more. Click here to be taken to the introduction post, and if you want to follow along with the whole series, enter your email address in the box toward the top right corner to subscribe to the blog. Thanks for reading!
0 Comments

Mere Christianity, Day 5: The Rival Conceptions of God

1/5/2015

0 Comments

 
Yesterday's post concluded Book One - Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe, so today picks up with Book Two - What Christians Believe. While Lewis used the first five chapters to address the philosophical arguments for the existence of the Moral Law and the Mind/Power that created it, Lewis uses these next five chapters to specifically address and provide a defense for the Christian perspective on these subjects.

He begins chapter one of Book Two by pointing out an important difference between the Christian worldview and the Atheist/Materialist worldview. Christians are not required to believe that all other religions are completely invalid and wrong with absolutely no truth in them, but "if you are an atheist, you do have to believe that the main point in all the religions of the whole world is simply one huge mistake," which would mean that most of the human race have always been wrong about the question of our existence and the purpose for it. Even when Christianity claims to be the exclusively right answer, it can still acknowledge and find shreds of truth in even the strangest religions, but the Atheist who is consistent within his worldview must view them all (and view those who believe in them) as wrong, mistaken, and wholly false.

Lewis goes on to explain two main divisions that people generally fall under:
Picture
Picture
Part of his purpose in showing these divisions is to point out that the Materialist/Atheist is not standing in opposition merely to Christianity when he says there is no God, no Creator, no Intelligent Designer, but rather he is standing in opposition to all religions that have existed all over the world throughout all time, which is a much broader and bolder claim when understood properly. Now just because it is a minority view does not make it inherently wrong; however, if it is the view you choose to embrace, it does imply that you ought to have serious evidence or arguments to back up your perspective.

After describing some of the different perspectives of pantheism (many gods) and monotheism (one God), Lewis then goes on to give a basic summary of the Christian worldview of God:

A good God made the world and everything in it, 
but many of those things have gone wrong, 
and God wants them to be made right again.
He mentions here that this raises a big question and one that he clung to for many years as an atheist: Why have things gone wrong? This is a question we still hear today. If there is a God, why is there so much suffering and evil in the world? Why do bad things happen even to very good people? But Lewis points out that these questions actually turn out to be more problematic for the atheist than for the Christian:
Picture
Picture
His sense of justice and feelings that the chaos of the world violated that justice failed to disprove God's existence and disrupted his idea that the whole of reality was senseless because it forced him to assume that there was at least one part of reality that was full of sense - the idea of justice. "If there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be a word without meaning." But Justice, Right, and Wrong; these are words that have meaning to every human being, which in turn suggests that there may be something more than just this world we know and see.

Do you agree with the idea that Atheism is actually too simple?
Whatever your worldview is, can you really defend and explain why you believe it?
Do you think it's important to be able to do so?

*This post is part of a 31 day series on C.S. Lewis' book Mere Christianity. If this is your first stop along the way, I am so glad you’re here! I would love to interact with you in the comments, or you can email me by clicking on the "Contact Me" tab at the top right of the page. All of the blog posts in this series will be linked together on the intro page if you are interested in reading more. Click here to be taken to the introduction post, and if you want to follow along with the whole series, enter your email address in the box toward the top right corner to subscribe to the blog. Thanks for reading!
0 Comments
    Picture

    About Shelby 
    and  why this is
    "Not the End"?

    Get Blog Posts By Email

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Follow my blog with Bloglovin

    Series Posts

    Picture
    31 Days of Real Life
    Picture
    Mere Christianity in 31 Days

    Popular Posts

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Perspective on Death

    Choice 
    (Lee's Story)


    3 Things I Hope My Sons Learn About Beauty

    Three Things I Learned at a Rave

    A Letter to My Friend on the Worst Day of Her Life  

    Categories

    All
    30 Years Old
    31 Days
    Apologetics
    Atheism
    Beauty
    Books
    Cancer
    Change
    Children
    Crafts
    C.S. Lewis
    Death
    Endurance
    Existence Of God
    Faithfulness
    Genetics
    Grace
    Happiness
    High School
    Life Lessons
    Love
    Meaning Of Marriage
    Mere Christianity
    Moral Law
    Nature Vs. Nurture
    Pain
    Patience
    Philosophy
    Psalm 1
    Psalm 13
    Psychology
    Real Life
    Sanctification
    Shane And Shane
    Sons
    Suffering
    Thankfulness
    The Goodness Of God
    Transformation
    Trust
    Waiting
    Word Wednesday

    Archives

    November 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.